Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance that he himself has spun...

Friday, September 19, 2014

FATCA Now the Law of the Land in France

For those of you who missed the FATCA debate yesterday in the French parliament, here are the essential links:

The video of the discussion (go to the box on the right side of the screen and scroll down and click on ACCORD FRANCE-ÉTATS-UNIS D’AMÉRIQUE RESPECT OBLIGATIONS FISCALES (LOI FATCA)
The transcription of the debate

I watched it this morning and here are few of my thoughts.

First of all, I was impressed by the high caliber of the discussion. All the individuals who spoke did so clearly and thoughfully.  I heartily wish American politicans could do half as well.

Framing:  I was very interested in seeing how the pro-FATCA camp framed their arguments and addressed certain reservations already put forward in previous debates.

The larger context, of course, is the Good Fight against tax evasion and fraud.  Even Pierre Lellouche (UMP) who spoke against the law admitted:
L’objectif affiché se passe bien sûr de toute discussion. Il s’agit d’œuvrer pour la transparence fiscale et de mettre fin, grâce à la coopération des États et à la transmission automatique des informations, à la fraude fiscale massive que connaît le monde : environ 6 000 milliards de dollars qui échappent à toute imposition.
De ce point de vue, personne ne peut être contre. Comme disent les Américains, personne ne peut être contre la tarte aux pommes et la patrie, apple pie and motherhood ; tout le monde est pour ! (Sourires.) À mort la transparence !
(The objective obviously needs no discussion. It is about fiscal transparency and the end, thanks to cooperation among states and the automatic transmission of information, to widespread tax evasion in the world:  6 000 billions of dollars that escape taxes.
From this point of view, no one could be against it.  As the Americans say, no one can be against apple pie and country, apple pie and motherhood;  Everyone is for! (Smiles).  Death to Transparency!
Is FATCA THE Solution to Tax Evasion?  Not one speaker thought that FATCA was perfect, they simply differed as to how bad it was and whether or not these problems were deal-breakers.

Expressions of discontent peppered the debate: "extraterritorial", "unilateral"  and the rather grim indictment, "Americans have a tendency to privilege their interests over international law."  If a better, more multilateral proposition had been on the table, then that would have been preferable.  But it's not a perfect world, said its proponents, and it's better than nothing.  If nothing else it has had the salutory effect of moving other information-sharing initiatives forward (OECD, for example) which means that FATCA is just a step on the way to a true and legitimate worldwide standard.

Reciprocity is a Problem:  I was pleasantly surprised that they were aware of just how fragile the US commitment to reciprocity really is.  US law does not at the moment permit the US government to provide the same level of information to France, but the FATCA proponents did not mention ALL of the potential legal and political problems with FATCA on the US side. Mme Odile Saugues:  
Tout d’abord, il existe une incertitude sur le principe de réciprocité, et notamment sur le solde des comptes et la valeur des actifs. Les États-Unis se sont formellement engagés à transmettre ces informations dès que leur droit interne le leur permettra – ce qui n’est pas le cas à ce jour. Les élus républicains du Congrès – Rand Paul, sénateur du Kentucky, et Bill Posey, représentant de l’État de Floride – bloquent actuellement la transmission de ces données dans le cadre du dispositif... Cette situation risque de durer jusqu’aux élections de mi-mandat aux États-Unis, qui auront lieu le 4 novembre prochain.
(First of all there is uncertainty about the principle of reciprocity and especially about account balances and stock values. The US has formally committed to sending this information as soon as their internal laws allow it. Republican lawmakers in Congress - Rand Paul, Senator from Kentucky, and Bill Posey, representative from the state of Florida - are blocking the transmission of this information in the context of this law... This situation may continue until the mid-term elections which will take place on November 4.)
Interesting. To my knowledge there is no projet de loi on the American side, just a brief paragraph hidden in the Obama budget bill. Furthermore, there are court cases launched (or about to be launched) in the US and Canada which are a real risk to FATCA. The American lawsuit, in particular, should have been mentioned since it calls into question, among other things, the legality of those inter-governmental agreements on the American side - those IGAs that the French government says they were in part responsible for forcing on the US along with other European countries like Germany.  

I would also say that even if the Democrats were to win and take control of the US Congress, Americans banks and financial institutions are important campaign donors to both parties and they will surely have something to say about reciprocity on the US side.

As one speaker put it about those IGAs and American promises: "Cette rédaction alambiquée est, pour qui connaît les institutions américaines, une vaste plaisanterie, qui rappelle le vieux proverbe selon lequel, en politique, les promesses n’engagent que ceux qui les écoutent."  (This convoluted text is, for those who know American institutions, a joke, reminiscent of the old adage in politics, promises only bind those who listen to them.)  Well said.

Impact of FATCA on French Citizens and Residents: Frédéric Lefebvre was the only speaker who addressed the impact of this law on French citizens. He spoke very eloquently in defense of the French abroad, the "Accidental Americans" in France and the 100,000 US citizens who are legal residents of the French Republic. (The full text of his speech is here.) No one will weep for the tax evaders caught in the net, he said, but:  "Il faut cependant prendre garde, je le dis avec gravité, aux effets pervers du dispositif tel qu’il nous est proposé." (You must be careful, and I say this to you with utmost seriousness, of the perverse effects of this law that you are proposing." )

Frédéric Lefebvre's motion to delay the implementation (and the vote) until these matters can be studied further was voted down and the law implementing FATCA in France was approved.


Blaze said...

What 's wrong with all these countries? Why are they so willing to sell out their own citizens, laws and constitutions to a foreign government?

P. Moore said...

Seems to me it is simply to protect the banks. The 30% extortion influences governments more than anybody's basic rights. Looks like the courts are the only place this all will get settled.

Anonymous said...

I agree with P Moore. When you read the transcript, they clearly say towards the end that the IGA is the least of the 2 evils. Without IGAs, more accounts would be closed to avoid the sanctions.
Money and banks are more important than citizens right.
Frederic Lefebvre did a fine job. Hopefully, he's follow up to make sure that there are safeguards in place to avoid more bank account closures.
There is now a second class of French citizens. Shameful.
That reminds me of regime de Vichy. History just repeats itself.

Blaze said...

If the NAFTA countries, all of the G7' G8, G20, Countries of the Americas, Francophone nations, APEC countries, Commonwealth countries, etc had banded together, they could have defeated FATCA quickly.

There is only one country in the world that belongs to all of those. Canada. So, Canada could have taken a leadership role to say No. Instead, our Cons in Canadian Parliament said "Congress has spoken."

Anonymous said...

@P. Moore
Canada, with its high number of residents of US origin is one of the only countries that can pull up a legal challenge, the UK might be the other.
It seems difficult to launch other legal actions in other countries with many less US persons.

EmBee said...

Thank you Victoria for that thoughtful summation. I'm guessing you already know about this ...

Anonymous said...

France capitulates again.

Anonymous said...

Victoria , Check this out

Anonymous said...

The difference between DA and RO. I am not being partisan, just being frank and calling a spade a spade.

Anonymous said...

Does anybody remember the stupid law congress made that forced all businesses in the homeland to file 1099s for every single transaction over USD 600?

Obama finally had to repeal it. But the dumb-asses who created it to begin with are probably still in office and most likely were involved in the creation of FATCA as well.

Vagabonde said...

I saw your comment in Veronique’s blog. I still would not wear tennis shoes when in Paris … too old-fashioned I guess.
I read your post with interest – here in suburban Atlanta, we rarely hear about French politics – Georgian columnists usually only write about what is wrong with France and the French and enjoy making fun of it! I also enjoyed that video of John Oliver on Scotland – and now we know the results.

Ex Democrat said...

Check this out in Singapore ! No one really loves this but they all have to hold their noses and swallow it. It is very sad. Singapore should just say NO! And soon everyone will say NO.

Anonymous said...

I cannot believe this is happening! I am a U.S. citizen, still live in America, and have received a letter from my Credit Suisse branch in Manchester, U.K. It informs me that I have 30 days to transfer the money, in 2 accounts, out of their bank. I earned that money working outside the U.S. for over twenty years, and dutifully paid all U.S. taxes that were owed. By staying and working outside the U.S. a person did not have to pay tax on the first $140,000 dollars. Now I will owe an additional 34 to 38 percent on that money if I transfer it into a U.S. bank. Scrambling now to check other options. This is dead wrong!

fed Up said...

US arrogance once again. Uncle Sam is throwing his weight around by threatening to cut off foreign access to US business ... or to tax it into oblivion. When US businesses suffer the same treatment, then he'll start to notice. If the US weren't such a financial and commercial power, it never could bully over 100 other countries around like this.

Anonymous said...

A firsthand account of FATCA in force in France:

Anonymous said...

MIKE LEE help to fight Fatca !

Anonymous said...

Hi Victoria,

Have you read the latest TIGTA report on International Tax collections?

Those "Custom holds" sound scary. Maybe something to bring up next week with Jim Bopp at the AARO meeting.

They don't even hide about going after residents ABROAD who are not compliant. After all, maybe this was the end goal of FATCA - not just catching a few rich tax evaders. Bopp must stop them!

Victoria FERAUGE said...

What an abundance of links and comments! Thank you.

What a mess this all is, mes amis. I took a few days off and read From Here to Eternity. And of that jolly cast of characters, was it any surprise that Jack Malloy was my favorite? On to George Orwell...

I will be at the Bopp event on Monday and I hope to see some of you there.